Google has experienced notable security incidents in the past. In 2018, a woman opened fire at YouTube’s office in San Bruno, California, injuring three people
Google is testing facial recognition technology at one of its campuses to enhance security measures and prevent unauthorized access. The initial test is being conducted at an Alphabet site in Kirkland, Washington, according to a document reviewed by CNBC.
The document outlines that interior security cameras are collecting facial data and comparing it with employee badge images, including those of the extended workforce, to identify any unauthorized individuals on the premises. Google’s Security and Resilience Services (GSRS) team is using this data to identify people who may pose a security risk to Google’s employees, products, or locations.
“There are protocols in place for identifying, reporting, and potentially removing known unauthorized persons to maintain the safety and security of our people and spaces,” the document states.
At the Kirkland site, individuals entering the building cannot opt out of the facial screening. However, the document clarifies that the data is used immediately and not stored. Employees can opt out of having their ID images stored by filling out a form. Google informed CNBC that while ID badge photos were part of the initial test, they won’t be used in future phases.
“For many years, our security team has been testing and implementing new systems and protections to help keep our people and spaces as safe as possible,” a Google spokesperson said in an email.
Google has experienced notable security incidents in the past. In 2018, a woman opened fire at YouTube’s office in San Bruno, California, injuring three people. She reportedly targeted YouTube because she was upset about the company blocking her videos.
The Kirkland test comes at a sensitive time for Google, as it is heavily involved in the artificial intelligence boom and rapidly integrating AI across its products and services. Facial recognition technology is particularly controversial due to privacy concerns surrounding surveillance.
